Star Power

Be who you are and shine bright like your own star

95 notes

Anonymous asked: I had actualy heard it was Moffat who had contacted the writer of the Doctor's Daughter and told him to keep her alive, and that the original script had Jenny dying. Although no one seemed to capitalized on it, what do you thing some form of a return from her would do for the show?

doctorwhoproblems:

Really? Wow, that surprises me, but it’s neat if that’s really what happened.

I think if Moffat brought Jenny back to the show, it would gain him a lot of points with people who are still 100% diehard RTD fans. It would show that he’s not afraid to embrace characters and plot points from before Eleven’s era, since he’s gone a little overboard at times with changing major established canon in order to reshape it and make it his own.

(Remember the backlash after he made the Daleks completely forget who the Doctor is in Series 7? Personally, I don’t necessarily think a lot of that backlash was warranted, because the nature of this series relies on change and “canon” has been written and rewritten over dozens of times from writer to writer, but nevertheless, the backlash occurred.)

So yeah, I think that would just give him a lot of props if he brought Jenny back, and it would also show that he’s willing to write Doctor Who: not just Moffat’s Doctor Who. And if Jenny returned, it would also almost certainly bring back viewers who might have given up on the show recently but look back fondly on Tennant’s episodes. And maybe those old fans would stick around for the rest of the series and become regular viewers.

3,026 notes

mind-palace-impala:

I love this shot! We are looking out at Sherlock and John from the interior of the laptop. (Note the reversed text on the screen. This is not a projection.)

This kind of storytelling just makes me really happy!

(via bbcssherlock)

352,510 notes

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.
So you might end up with more donuts.
But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?
Hrm.
HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.
tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

tyleroakley:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

Thank you donut side of Tumblr.

(Source: nimstrz, via dr-horribles-sing-along-blog)

61,839 notes

jaclcfrost:

the whole concept of flirting is just lost on me most of the time really. whenever someone is like “oh they were flirting with you” i’m just like. what. whenever someone is like “were you flirting with them?” i’m just like. what. whenever someone is like “oh you totally were flirting with them!” i’m just like. what. what is flirting. what is going on. what. i have no idea what’s going on. what

(via dr-horribles-sing-along-blog)